Talk:Distant Early Warning Line

Alaska Mid‑importance

	Alaska portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Alaska, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Alaska on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AlaskaWikipedia:WikiProject AlaskaTemplate:WikiProject AlaskaAlaska articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Aviation B‑class

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

B

This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Canada Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Cold War High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cold War, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Cold War on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Cold WarWikipedia:WikiProject Cold WarTemplate:WikiProject Cold WarCold War articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Aviation / Canadian / North America / United States / Cold War

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military aviation task force
	Canadian military history task force
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force
	Cold War task force (c. 1945 – c. 1989)

Arctic

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Arctic, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Arctic on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArcticWikipedia:WikiProject ArcticTemplate:WikiProject ArcticArctic articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on February 15, 2014 and February 15, 2016.

Comment

Should there be a "Popular Culture" section that mentions the song "Distant Early Warning" by Rush?

Yes. Also things like the regular seasonal NORAD announcments that DEW stations had picked up an unknown object, apparently a fat man in a red suit and some reindeer, approaching North America.....Skookum1 (talk) 15:44, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please. What part of a Rush song had a major cultural impact? Did it even make the Top 10? Not every trivial mention deserves inclusion. If you really believe it belongs, demonstrate the significance. Demonstrate the impact, with sources. TREKphiler ^{any time you're ready, Uhura} 21:19 & 21:23, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Personally, every time I see a "Popular Culture" section it's usually filled with trivial B.S. that has nothing really to do with the article it's a part of. This one here is no different. Bwmoll3 (talk) 03:37, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

And everytime I see objection to these sections, it enforces the notion that Wikipedia is driven by a mentality of "my little corner of the world is sacred" and "the world is millions, if not billions, of islands unto themselves". RadioKAOS – Talk to me, Billy 23:22, 28 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comment

Initially, BarLant consisted of three WV-2 squadrons (VW-11, VW-13 and VW-15), but was later (date?) reduced to two squadrons (VW-11 and VW-13) with support from Airborne Early Warning Training Unit Atlantic (AEWTULANT), Patuxant River, MD.

Initially, BarPac consisted of three WV-2 squadrons (VW-12, VW-14 and VW-16), but was soon consolidated into one large single (largest-ever in USN) squadron (date?) named Airborne Early Warning Barrier Squadron Pacific (AEWBARRONPAC).

E.L.McCaul, ex-AT1(AC), USN VW13,VW-11,VW1 and PMR —Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.18.67.172 (talk) 00:32, 3 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Doobie doobie DEW

Where was the first station completed, & when...? S. Claus ^{not now, Rudolph!}

We don't use personal experiences in our articles

To editor 38.127.205.125: Discussion about articles takes place here, on the talk page, not on the article itself. While you may or may not have knowledge about the topic, your input is original research, which is prohibited. Wikipedia relies on independent, published, reliable sources. This requirement is absolute. If you can agree to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines as I've described I recommend that you register for a user account so the community can interact with you and not the random IP you use. If what I've described is a problem, then Wikipedia is not for you. Chris Troutman (talk) 16:30, 16 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Distant Early Warning Line. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:41, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Article issues

This is listed as a B-class article supported by 3 projects (notified). The criteria (#1) states: The article is suitably referenced, with inline citations. It has reliable sources, and any important or controversial material which is likely to be challenged is cited.

There is a "citation needed" tags dated July 2012, April 2021, and a section "needs additional citations for verification" dated February 2017. These are issues "not" consistent with the classification.

There are 14 entries in the "External links" section. While 3 or possible 4 is generally accepted this has grown to become a link parking space that goes against WP:ELPOINTS #3.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Otr500 (talk • contribs) 08:42, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not just that, but obvious link spam, as many of them are to the same site that is described in one entry in a distinctly non-npov manner while using a non-notable individual's name. Any of these that add anything should already have been used as references - and the others are blogs. I have trimmed it down to the two official movies. I also downgraded the page to C class across the board, pending additional references being added - or more cruft being trimmed. - NiD.29 (talk) 18:05, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Edit Assistance Requested- Links required

Hello fellow Wikipedians. I haven't done any editing for some time, after my work was deleted for 'lack of notability' (or something like that) by Revision Nazis. Jimmy Wales has also had content deleted, so I guess I'm in good company. Anyways, I couldn't remember how to add links to other Wiki content, so if someone can assist, that would be great. References used included BING A.I. and https://lswilson.dewlineadventures.com/ which I corroborated with my own personal experience (which, I know, is considered worthless on Wiki). Markus451 (talk) 04:04, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You can't cite AI or use AI generated text. You can't cite personal anecdotes that are not verifiable. Use something published that also has an editor, not self-published. Sounds like you already know this, but use WP:RS and WP:cite. --Dual Freq (talk) 15:14, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wish my Father was alive; he worked on the DEW Line while in the Royal Canadian Navy. All his photos are with another family member. 216.154.12.248 (talk) 03:11, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]